Click Nothing

design from a long time ago

recent posts

  1. Sven's avatar
  2. Unknown's avatar

    I’m one of the author’s in the 2022 opdc (didn’t win anything, still trying to bear up under the shame…

  3. Arya's avatar
  4. Max Clark's avatar
  5. Kfix's avatar

    Thank you for this very interesting collection, and for wrestling with the obviously mixed feelings on this anniversary. And thank…

Rapture Comes to Montreal

If the player ever asks himself "I wonder if I can do X?", the answer had better be "Yes".

That’s one of the mantras of my design team. Basically it means that your game invites the player to ask questions about what he can and cannot do, and if you are inviting him to ask questions that you can’t answer, well, you’re not doing your job as a designer. In a sideways way, this concept ties all the way back to my first GDC talk back in 2004, and is pretty central to my design ‘philosophy’ if I have such a thing.

So I’m super excited that next week the Montreal IGDA Chapter will be hosting a presentation subtitled "Saying ‘Yes’ to the Player" by the Lead Programmer of Bioshock. I’m very excited to hear what he has to say.

For anyone who will be in th Montreal area, admission to the event is only $5 – and of course it’s free for IGDA members.

Posted in , , , , ,

3 responses to “Rapture Comes to Montreal”

  1. Soren Johnson Avatar
    Soren Johnson

    sounds great… hope they post a video like from the recent IGDA San Diego session:
    http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=15305

    Like

    Reply
  2. William Erasmus Avatar
    William Erasmus

    The frustration of being answered “no” has been my constant companion throughout the single player portion of many games. Things like “This RPG can blow up that tower over there…can I use it to blow up this wall?” would yield a disappointing no as the grenade exploded unsatisfactorily on the static mesh. As a prime example, the game Black irritated me eventually when I realised you could only blow up things you were meant to blow up. It encouraged you to ask questions and experiment with the boundaries, but it didn’t always deliver what it promised. (Though, that game did take leaps forward in terms of environmental destruction.)
    With the advances in technology, I really hope all developers start using the hardware to its full potential and “answering yes”.
    Games like Bioshock and Medal of Honour: Airborne have already done this, using open-ended level design and fantastic game design choices that actually combine to create a game experience not far off from an Elder Scrolls RPG (The sky is very nearly the limit in those games, and you have a true sense of freedom and liberty). This is excellent to see in first-person shooters, and I hope other developers carry on this trend.

    Like

    Reply
  3. Clint Avatar
    Clint

    Erasmus – I think your response emphasizes the primary importance of controlling what the player asks. This is probably MORE important that what the answer is in the end, because the answer is typially a technology constraint whereas controlling the questions is just good design.
    You say Bioshock and Airborne are good examples – but clearly it’s not because walls in Bioshock are systemically destructible and can be destroyed by falling towers. These are good examples because they don;t invite the questions of whether or not you can destroy walls.
    In a lot of ways, I think having a uniform simulation fidelity does most of the work – but it’s hard to build such a uniformity in today’s games and still have ‘cool explosions’… nevermind the added challenge of having human entities simulated to the same fidelity as guns or vehicles….

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment